data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0101/b0101f7a3a3ab390d34bcae1594824e692c3ad3c" alt=""
the Coen Brothers obviously seem to think they have something to prove with
No Country For Old Men; its every step is as focused and mean as Javier Bardem's unforgettable Chigurh (who here gives Hannibal Lecter a run for his monstrous money), as if the Coens are apologizing for their recent slump with a middle finger and a shrug. in many ways it's a return to form, as airtight and flawless in its scripting and execution as the Coens' best, but despite debts to the relatively straightfaced pulp of
Fargo and
Blood Simple (plus an ending that loses a bit of solemnity when put alongside
Raising Arizona's) they step pretty far outside their comfort zone, and even their audience's. the witty performance flourishes are there in subdued bit parts, and the Coens' sensibilities meld surprisingly with McCarthy's own nihilism, but much of
No Country also seems uncharacteristically clinical where the rest of their films brake at giddy precision. it may well be that the brothers needed a comedic palate cleanser after the one-two stumble of
Intolerable Cruelty and
The (underrated)
Ladykillers, and
No Country For Old Men is certainly that, but even as it repeatedly assures their seat among the cinema's living masters, its pitch-black efficiency repels nearly as often as it provokes.
No Country For Old Men is unfathomable in its raw quality, but the bleak misanthropy of nearly every frame leaves it distancing, as hard to like as it is to disrespect.
No comments:
Post a Comment